[tip: locking/core] Documentation/locking/locktypes: Fix local_locks documentation

[tip-bot2 for Marta Rybczynska]

The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     92b4e9f11a636d1723cc0866bf8b9111b1e24339
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/92b4e9f11a636d1723cc0866bf8b9111b1e24339
Author:        Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate:    Sun, 26 Jul 2020 20:54:40 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:42:02 +02:00

Documentation/locking/locktypes: Fix local_locks documentation

Fix issues with local_locks documentation:

 - fix function names, local_lock.h has local_unlock_irqrestore(), not
   local_lock_irqrestore()

 - fix mapping table, local_unlock_irqrestore() maps to
   local_irq_restore(), not _save()

Signed-off-by: Marta Rybczynska <rybczynska@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAApg2=SKxQ3Sqwj6TZnV-0x0cKLXFKDaPvXT4N15MPDMKq724g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
 Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
index 4cefed8..ddada4a 100644
--- a/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
+++ b/Documentation/locking/locktypes.rst
@@ -164,14 +164,14 @@ by disabling preemption or interrupts.
 On non-PREEMPT_RT kernels local_lock operations map to the preemption and
 interrupt disabling and enabling primitives:
 
- =========================== ======================
- local_lock(&llock)          preempt_disable()
- local_unlock(&llock)        preempt_enable()
- local_lock_irq(&llock)      local_irq_disable()
- local_unlock_irq(&llock)    local_irq_enable()
- local_lock_save(&llock)     local_irq_save()
- local_lock_restore(&llock)  local_irq_save()
- =========================== ======================
+ ===============================  ======================
+ local_lock(&llock)               preempt_disable()
+ local_unlock(&llock)             preempt_enable()
+ local_lock_irq(&llock)           local_irq_disable()
+ local_unlock_irq(&llock)         local_irq_enable()
+ local_lock_irqsave(&llock)       local_irq_save()
+ local_unlock_irqrestore(&llock)  local_irq_restore()
+ ===============================  ======================
 
 The named scope of local_lock has two advantages over the regular
 primitives:
@@ -353,14 +353,14 @@ protection scope. So the following substitution is wrong::
   {
     local_irq_save(flags);    -> local_lock_irqsave(&local_lock_1, flags);
     func3();
-    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_lock_irqrestore(&local_lock_1, flags);
+    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_unlock_irqrestore(&local_lock_1, flags);
   }
 
   func2()
   {
     local_irq_save(flags);    -> local_lock_irqsave(&local_lock_2, flags);
     func3();
-    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_lock_irqrestore(&local_lock_2, flags);
+    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_unlock_irqrestore(&local_lock_2, flags);
   }
 
   func3()
@@ -379,14 +379,14 @@ PREEMPT_RT-specific semantics of spinlock_t. The correct substitution is::
   {
     local_irq_save(flags);    -> local_lock_irqsave(&local_lock, flags);
     func3();
-    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_lock_irqrestore(&local_lock, flags);
+    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_unlock_irqrestore(&local_lock, flags);
   }
 
   func2()
   {
     local_irq_save(flags);    -> local_lock_irqsave(&local_lock, flags);
     func3();
-    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_lock_irqrestore(&local_lock, flags);
+    local_irq_restore(flags); -> local_unlock_irqrestore(&local_lock, flags);
   }
 
   func3()