Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: No need to verify cpufreq_driver in show_scaling_cur_freq()

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 7:24 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> "cpufreq_driver" is guaranteed to be valid here, no need to check it
> here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 02ab56b2a0d8..47aa90f9a7c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -703,8 +703,7 @@ static ssize_t show_scaling_cur_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>         freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(policy->cpu);
>         if (freq)
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", freq);
> -       else if (cpufreq_driver && cpufreq_driver->setpolicy &&
> -                       cpufreq_driver->get)
> +       else if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy && cpufreq_driver->get)
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu));
>         else
>                 ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
> --

This and the [2/2] applied, the latter with some minor edits in the
subject/changelog.

Thanks!