Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] usb typec: mt6360: Add support for mt6360 Type-C driver

From: ChiYuan Huang
Date: Fri Aug 28 2020 - 06:27:45 EST


Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年8月28日 週五 下午5:39寫道:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:51:43PM +0800, ChiYuan Huang wrote:
> > Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年8月27日 週四 下午10:00寫道:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 07:18:55PM +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > > > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Mediatek MT6360 is a multi-functional IC that includes USB Type-C.
> > > > It works with Type-C Port Controller Manager to provide USB PD
> > > > and USB Type-C functionalities.
> > > >
> > > > v1 to v2
> > > > 1. Add fix to Prevent the race condition from interrupt and tcpci port
> > > > unregister during module remove.
> > > >
> > > > v2 to v3
> > > > 1. Change comment style for the head of source code.
> > > > 2. No need to print error for platform_get_irq_byname.
> > > > 3. Fix tcpci_register_port check from IS_ERR_OR_NULL to IS_ERR.
> > > > 4. Rename driver/Kconfig/Makefile form mt6360 to mt636x.
> > > > 5. Rename DT binding documents from mt6360 to mt636x.
> > >
> > > You don't place additional changelog here...
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > You put it here, after that '---' marker:
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
> > >
> > HI Hekki:
> > after reading the document, I have a little bit confused how to
> > use diffstat for the changelog.
> > Is there any example that make me know to write a clear
> > description for the changelog?
>
> Picking the latest patch from linux-usb ml. with version history:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/1598083553-31896-11-git-send-email-chunfeng.yun@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> See how the last tag line "Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun..." is followed
> by marker "---", which then is followed by the version history (the
> version history is then also ended with the marker "---", a step that
> I don't think is mandatory, but commonly used and often recommended).
>
> That way that patch version history does not contaminate the actual
> commit message.
>
>
> thanks,
>
Ah, I already send the patch v4, I only add the changelog after the
sign-off --- label, but forget to add --- after changelog ended

Please let me resend the patch v4 to add --- label after the change log eded.
> --
> heikki