Re: [PATCH 01/10] fs: don't allow kernel reads and writes without iter ops
From: 'Christoph Hellwig'
Date: Sat Aug 29 2020 - 05:23:59 EST
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 03:58:02PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Is there a real justification for that?
> For system calls supplying both methods makes sense to avoid
> the extra code paths for a simple read/write.
Al asked for it as two of our four in-tree instances do have weird
semantics, and we can't change that any more. And the other two
don't make sense to be used with kernel_read and kernel_write (
(/dev/null and /dev/zero).