Re: [PATCH] iio: frequency: adf4350: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock

From: Jonathan Cameron
Date: Sat Aug 29 2020 - 11:48:33 EST


On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 09:42:57 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock on the device's state structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> index 409c9c47161e..3f37a57cd3c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct adf4350_state {
> unsigned long regs[6];
> unsigned long regs_hw[6];
> unsigned long long freq_req;
> + struct mutex lock;
Same thing about need for a comment in the code on what the lock scope is.
I'm sure checkpatch used to moan about this. I guess maybe it stopped
doing so at some stage.

Jonathan

> /*
> * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) requires the
> * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
> @@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ static int adf4350_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (reg > ADF4350_REG5)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> if (readval == NULL) {
> st->regs[reg] = writeval & ~(BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2));
> ret = adf4350_sync_config(st);
> @@ -107,7 +108,7 @@ static int adf4350_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> *readval = st->regs_hw[reg];
> ret = 0;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> switch ((u32)private) {
> case ADF4350_FREQ:
> ret = adf4350_set_freq(st, readin);
> @@ -295,7 +296,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret ? ret : len;
> }
> @@ -309,7 +310,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> unsigned long long val;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> switch ((u32)private) {
> case ADF4350_FREQ:
> val = (u64)((st->r0_int * st->r1_mod) + st->r0_fract) *
> @@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> val = 0;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", val);
> }
> @@ -539,6 +540,8 @@ static int adf4350_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> indio_dev->channels = &adf4350_chan;
> indio_dev->num_channels = 1;
>
> + mutex_init(&st->lock);
> +
> st->chspc = pdata->channel_spacing;
> if (clk) {
> st->clk = clk;