RE: [PATCH v6 0/2] make dma_alloc_coherent NUMA-aware by per-NUMA CMA

[Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 6:19 PM
> To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: hch@xxxxxx; m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx; robin.murphy@xxxxxxx;
> will@xxxxxxxxxx; ganapatrao.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxxx;
> catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Linuxarm
> <linuxarm@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; huangdaode <huangdaode@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] make dma_alloc_coherent NUMA-aware by
> per-NUMA CMA
> 
> FYI, as of the last one I'm fine now, bit I really need an ACK from
> the arm64 maintainers.

Hi Christoph,

For the changes in arch/arm64, Will gave his ack here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200821090116.GB20255@willie-the-truck/

and the patchset has been refined to v8
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200823230309.28980-1-song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
with one additional patch to remove magic number:
[PATCH v8 3/3] mm: cma: use CMA_MAX_NAME to define the length of cma name array
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20200823230309.28980-4-song.bao.hua@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Hopefully, you didn't miss it:-)
Does the new one need an Ack from Linux-mm maintainer?

Thanks
Barry