[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/19] tick-sched: Clarify "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending" warning

[paulmck]

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently, can_stop_idle_tick() prints "NOHZ: local_softirq_pending HH"
(where "HH" is the hexadecimal softirq vector number) when one or more
non-RCU softirq handlers are still enabled when checking to stop the
scheduler-tick interrupt.  This message is not as enlightening as one
might hope, so this commit changes it to "NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU
local softirq work is pending, handler #HH".

Reported-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index f0199a4..81632cd 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -927,7 +927,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
 
 		if (ratelimit < 10 &&
 		    (local_softirq_pending() & SOFTIRQ_STOP_IDLE_MASK)) {
-			pr_warn("NOHZ: local_softirq_pending %02x\n",
+			pr_warn("NOHZ tick-stop error: Non-RCU local softirq work is pending, handler #%02x!!!\n",
 				(unsigned int) local_softirq_pending());
 			ratelimit++;
 		}
-- 
2.9.5