On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 09:23:08AM +0000, Maoming (maoming, Cloud Infrastructure Service Product Dept.) wrote:
In hugetlb_put_pfn(), I delete unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock() and use some simple code to put hugetlb pages.I think we should still use the APIs because of the the same reason. However
Is this right?
again I don't know the performance impact of that to your patch, but I still
think that could be done inside gup itself when needed (e.g., a special path
for hugetlbfs for [un]pinning continuous pages; though if that's the case that
could be something to be discussed on -mm then as a separate patch, imho).
Thanks,