Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] tracing: export event trace and trace_marker

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:37:40PM +0800, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
> 
> May I know your comments for this patch set?

I do not maintain any of these files.

> 
> Thanks,
> Tingwei
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 09:45:46AM +0800, Tingwei Zhang wrote:
> > Ftrace has ability to export trace packets to other destination.
> > Currently, only function trace can be exported. This series extends the
> > support to event trace and trace_maker. STM is one possible destination to
> > export ftrace. Use separate channel for each CPU to avoid mixing up
> > packets
> > from different CPUs together.
> > 
> > Change from v2:
> > Change flag definition to BIT(). (Steven)
> > Add comment in stm_ftrace_write() to clarify it's safe to use 
> > smp_processor_id() here since preempt is disabled. (Steven) 
> > 
> > Change from v1:
> > All changes are suggested by Steven Rostedt.
> > User separate flag to control function trace, event trace and trace mark.
> > Allocate channels according to num_possible_cpu() dynamically.
> > Move ftrace_exports routines up so all ftrace can use them.
> > 
> > Tingwei Zhang (6):
> >   stm class: ftrace: change dependency to TRACING
> >   tracing: add flag to control different traces
> >   tracing: add trace_export support for event trace
> >   tracing: add trace_export support for trace_marker
> >   stm class: ftrace: enable supported trace export flag
> >   stm class: ftrace: use different channel accroding to CPU
> > 
> >  drivers/hwtracing/stm/Kconfig  |   2 +-
> >  drivers/hwtracing/stm/ftrace.c |   7 +-
> >  include/linux/trace.h          |   7 +
> >  kernel/trace/trace.c           | 270 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  4 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> >