Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v3 02/14] devlink: Add reload actions counters
From: Moshe Shemesh
Date:  Tue Sep 01 2020 - 15:05:52 EST
On 8/31/2020 1:48 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 05:27:22PM CEST, moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Add reload actions counters to hold the history per reload action type.
For example, the number of times fw_activate has been done on this
device since the driver module was added or if the firmware activation
was done with or without reset.
The function devlink_reload_actions_cnts_update() is exported to enable
also drivers update on reload actions done, for example in case firmware
activation with reset finished successfully but was initiated by remote
host.
Signed-off-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2 -> v3:
- New patch
---
include/net/devlink.h |  2 ++
net/core/devlink.c    | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/devlink.h b/include/net/devlink.h
index b8f0152a1fff..0547f0707d92 100644
--- a/include/net/devlink.h
+++ b/include/net/devlink.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct devlink {
	struct list_head trap_policer_list;
	const struct devlink_ops *ops;
	struct xarray snapshot_ids;
+	u32 reload_actions_cnts[DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX];
	struct device *dev;
	possible_net_t _net;
	struct mutex lock; /* Serializes access to devlink instance specific objects such as
@@ -1372,6 +1373,7 @@ void
devlink_health_reporter_recovery_done(struct devlink_health_reporter *reporter);
bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink);
+void devlink_reload_actions_cnts_update(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned long actions_done);
void devlink_flash_update_begin_notify(struct devlink *devlink);
void devlink_flash_update_end_notify(struct devlink *devlink);
diff --git a/net/core/devlink.c b/net/core/devlink.c
index 8d4137ad40db..20a29c34ff71 100644
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@ -2969,10 +2969,23 @@ bool devlink_is_reload_failed(const struct devlink *devlink)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_is_reload_failed);
+void devlink_reload_actions_cnts_update(struct devlink *devlink, unsigned long actions_done)
+{
+	int action;
+
+	for (action = 0; action < DEVLINK_RELOAD_ACTION_MAX; action++) {
+		if (!test_bit(action, &actions_done))
+			continue;
+		devlink->reload_actions_cnts[action]++;
+	}
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devlink_reload_actions_cnts_update);
I don't follow why this is an exported symbol if you only use it from
this .c. Looks like a leftover...
Not leftover, in the commit message I notified and explained why I 
exposed it.
+
static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
			  enum devlink_reload_action action, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
-			  unsigned long *actions_done)
+			  unsigned long *actions_done_out)
{
+	unsigned long actions_done;
	int err;
	if (!devlink->reload_enabled)
@@ -2985,9 +2998,14 @@ static int devlink_reload(struct devlink *devlink, struct net *dest_net,
	if (dest_net && !net_eq(dest_net, devlink_net(devlink)))
		devlink_reload_netns_change(devlink, dest_net);
-	err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, actions_done);
+	err = devlink->ops->reload_up(devlink, action, extack, &actions_done);
	devlink_reload_failed_set(devlink, !!err);
-	return err;
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	devlink_reload_actions_cnts_update(devlink, actions_done);
+	if (actions_done_out)
+		*actions_done_out = actions_done;
Why don't you just use the original actions_done directly without having
extra local variable?
Because the parameter can be NULL if not needed, see patch 01/14 
devlink_reload() called from devlink_pernet_pre_exit()
+	return 0;
}
static int
--
2.17.1