RE: [PATCH 01/11] evm: Execute evm_inode_init_security() only when the HMAC key is loaded
From: Roberto Sassu
Date: Wed Sep 02 2020 - 07:42:45 EST
> From: Mimi Zohar [mailto:zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 7:45 PM
> Hi Roberto,
>
> On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 14:30 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay in reviewing these patches. Missing from this
> > patch set is a cover letter with an explanation for grouping these
> > patches into a patch set, other than for convenience. In this case, it
> > would be along the lines that the original use case for EVM portable
> > and immutable keys support was for a few critical files, not combined
> > with an EVM encrypted key type. This patch set more fully integrates
> > the initial EVM portable and immutable signature support.
>
> Thank you for more fully integrating the EVM portable signatures into
> IMA.
>
> " [PATCH 08/11] ima: Allow imasig requirement to be satisfied by EVM
> portable signatures" equates an IMA signature to having a portable and
> immutable EVM signature. That is true in terms of signature
> verification, but from an attestation perspective the "ima-sig"
> template will not contain a signature. If not the EVM signature, then
> at least some other indication should be included in the measurement
> list.
Would it be ok to print the EVM portable signature in the sig field if the IMA
signature is not found? Later we can introduce the new template evm-sig
to include all metadata necessary to verify the EVM portable signature.
> Are you planning on posting the associated IMA/EVM regression tests?
I didn't have a look yet at the code. I will try to write some later.
Roberto
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli