Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dynamic debug: allow printing to trace event

[Vincent Whitchurch]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 09:53:57PM +0200, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 15:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 08:53:25 -0700
> > Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > > The print buffer is statically allocated and managed using code borrowed
> > > > from __ftrace_trace_stack() and is limited to 256 bytes (four of these
> > > > are allocated per CPU to handle the various contexts); anything larger
> > > > will be truncated.  
> > > 
> > > There is an effort to avoid using trace_printk and the like
> > > so perhaps this feature should have the same compile time
> > > guard.
> > 
> > No, this is fine for being in a production kernel. Basically, these are
> > simply debug printk()s that can also be put into the trace buffer. The
> > key difference to trace_printk() is that they are an event that needs
> > to be enabled to write into the buffer.
> 
> It just seems like a backdoor way to convert various pr_debug functions
> (dev_dbg/netdev_dbg, et al) into tracing.
> 
> What's the real value?  Timing data?  Something else?

I mentioned my use case for this in the commit message and why it works
much better than printk() for that, please let me know if it is unclear:

 When debugging device drivers, I've found it very useful to be able to
 redirect existing pr_debug()/dev_dbg() prints to the trace buffer
 instead of dmesg.  Among the many advantages of the trace buffer is that
 it can be dynamically resized, allows these prints to combined with
 other trace events, and doesn't fill up system logs.

This is my only use case for this, and I've used it very very often
during the years I've been carrying this patch locally.