[PATCH RESEND] smsc9420: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API
From: Christophe JAILLET
Date: Thu Sep 03 2020 - 16:11:10 EST
The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
It has been compile tested.
When memory is allocated in 'smsc9420_probe()', GFP_KERNEL can be used
because it is a probe function and no lock is acquired.
While at it, rewrite the size passed to 'dma_alloc_coherent()' the same way
as the one passed to 'dma_free_coherent()'. This form is less verbose:
sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * RX_RING_SIZE +
sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * TX_RING_SIZE,
vs
sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE)
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE
@@
@@
- PCI_DMA_NONE
+ DMA_NONE
@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3;
@@
- pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
+ dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
@@
- pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
+ dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
@@
- pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
+ dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
+ dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
@@
expression e1, e2;
@@
- pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
+ dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
RESEND because it was previously sent when the branch was closed
---
drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c | 51 +++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
index 42bef04d65ba..68969549a5c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smsc9420.c
@@ -497,8 +497,9 @@ static void smsc9420_free_tx_ring(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd)
if (skb) {
BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping);
- pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping,
- skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+ pd->tx_buffers[i].mapping, skb->len,
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE);
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
}
@@ -530,8 +531,9 @@ static void smsc9420_free_rx_ring(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd)
dev_kfree_skb_any(pd->rx_buffers[i].skb);
if (pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping)
- pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping,
- PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+ pd->rx_buffers[i].mapping,
+ PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
pd->rx_ring[i].status = 0;
pd->rx_ring[i].length = 0;
@@ -749,8 +751,8 @@ static void smsc9420_rx_handoff(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd, const int index,
dev->stats.rx_packets++;
dev->stats.rx_bytes += packet_length;
- pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping,
- PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
+ dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev, pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping,
+ PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
pd->rx_buffers[index].mapping = 0;
skb = pd->rx_buffers[index].skb;
@@ -782,9 +784,9 @@ static int smsc9420_alloc_rx_buffer(struct smsc9420_pdata *pd, int index)
if (unlikely(!skb))
return -ENOMEM;
- mapping = pci_map_single(pd->pdev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
- PKT_BUF_SZ, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
- if (pci_dma_mapping_error(pd->pdev, mapping)) {
+ mapping = dma_map_single(&pd->pdev->dev, skb_tail_pointer(skb),
+ PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ if (dma_mapping_error(&pd->pdev->dev, mapping)) {
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
netif_warn(pd, rx_err, pd->dev, "pci_map_single failed!\n");
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -901,8 +903,10 @@ static void smsc9420_complete_tx(struct net_device *dev)
BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
BUG_ON(!pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping);
- pci_unmap_single(pd->pdev, pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping,
- pd->tx_buffers[index].skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
+ dma_unmap_single(&pd->pdev->dev,
+ pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping,
+ pd->tx_buffers[index].skb->len,
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE);
pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping = 0;
dev_kfree_skb_any(pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
@@ -932,9 +936,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t smsc9420_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
BUG_ON(pd->tx_buffers[index].skb);
BUG_ON(pd->tx_buffers[index].mapping);
- mapping = pci_map_single(pd->pdev, skb->data,
- skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
- if (pci_dma_mapping_error(pd->pdev, mapping)) {
+ mapping = dma_map_single(&pd->pdev->dev, skb->data, skb->len,
+ DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ if (dma_mapping_error(&pd->pdev->dev, mapping)) {
netif_warn(pd, tx_err, pd->dev,
"pci_map_single failed, dropping packet\n");
return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
@@ -1522,7 +1526,7 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
goto out_free_netdev_2;
}
- if (pci_set_dma_mask(pdev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
+ if (dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
netdev_err(dev, "No usable DMA configuration, aborting\n");
goto out_free_regions_3;
}
@@ -1540,10 +1544,9 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
pd = netdev_priv(dev);
/* pci descriptors are created in the PCI consistent area */
- pd->rx_ring = pci_alloc_consistent(pdev,
- sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * RX_RING_SIZE +
- sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * TX_RING_SIZE,
- &pd->rx_dma_addr);
+ pd->rx_ring = dma_alloc_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+ &pd->rx_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pd->rx_ring)
goto out_free_io_4;
@@ -1599,8 +1602,9 @@ smsc9420_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
return 0;
out_free_dmadesc_5:
- pci_free_consistent(pdev, sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) *
- (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE), pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
+ dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+ pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
out_free_io_4:
iounmap(virt_addr - LAN9420_CPSR_ENDIAN_OFFSET);
out_free_regions_3:
@@ -1632,8 +1636,9 @@ static void smsc9420_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
BUG_ON(!pd->tx_ring);
BUG_ON(!pd->rx_ring);
- pci_free_consistent(pdev, sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) *
- (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE), pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
+ dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev,
+ sizeof(struct smsc9420_dma_desc) * (RX_RING_SIZE + TX_RING_SIZE),
+ pd->rx_ring, pd->rx_dma_addr);
iounmap(pd->ioaddr - LAN9420_CPSR_ENDIAN_OFFSET);
pci_release_regions(pdev);
--
2.25.1