Re: [PATCH 00/20] iommu/arm-smmu + drm/msm: per-process GPU pgtables

[Joerg Roedel]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> Jordan Crouse (12):
>   iommu/arm-smmu: Pass io-pgtable config to implementation specific
>     function
>   iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for split pagetables
>   iommu/arm-smmu: Prepare for the adreno-smmu implementation
>   iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Add implementation for the adreno GPU SMMU
>   dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add compatible string for Adreno GPU SMMU
>   drm/msm: Add a context pointer to the submitqueue
>   drm/msm: Drop context arg to gpu->submit()
>   drm/msm: Set the global virtual address range from the IOMMU domain
>   drm/msm: Add support to create a local pagetable
>   drm/msm: Add support for private address space instances
>   drm/msm/a6xx: Add support for per-instance pagetables
>   arm: dts: qcom: sm845: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU
> 
> Rob Clark (8):
>   drm/msm: remove dangling submitqueue references
>   iommu: add private interface for adreno-smmu
>   drm/msm/gpu: add dev_to_gpu() helper
>   drm/msm: set adreno_smmu as gpu's drvdata
>   iommu/arm-smmu: constify some helpers
>   arm: dts: qcom: sc7180: Set the compatible string for the GPU SMMU
>   iommu/arm-smmu: add a way for implementations to influence SCTLR
>   drm/msm: show process names in gem_describe

Can the DRM parts be merged independently from the IOMMU parts or does
this need to be queued together? If it needs to be together I defer the
decission to Will through which tree this should go.


	Joerg