Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: arm_scmi: Constify scmi_perf_ops pointers

[Viresh Kumar]

On 07-09-20, 11:44, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:55:51PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 07-09-20, 11:22, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > Hi Viresh,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 01:04:50AM +0200, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> > > > The perf_ops are not modified through this pointer. Make them const to
> > > > indicate that. This is in preparation to make the scmi-ops pointers in
> > > > scmi_handle const.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Your ack needed to take this as series via {arm-,}soc
> >
> > Can I just pick the first patch and you do the rest ? Will it result
> > in any warnings at either end ?
> >
> 
> Initially I thought out suggesting the same, but then I realised(not
> checked though), without this change in arm-soc the scmi-cpufreq driver
> might produce warnings as the const value gets assigned to non const.
> No ?

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
viresh