Re: [PATCH RFC 07/10] kfence, kmemleak: make KFENCE compatible with KMEMLEAK

From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Tue Sep 08 2020 - 07:59:30 EST


On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 03:40:52PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> From: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add compatibility with KMEMLEAK, by making KMEMLEAK aware of the KFENCE
> memory pool. This allows building debug kernels with both enabled, which
> also helped in debugging KFENCE.
>
> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/kmemleak.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index 5e252d91eb14..2809c25c0a88 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
> #include <linux/atomic.h>
>
> #include <linux/kasan.h>
> +#include <linux/kfence.h>
> #include <linux/kmemleak.h>
> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h>
>
> @@ -1946,8 +1947,18 @@ void __init kmemleak_init(void)
> /* register the data/bss sections */
> create_object((unsigned long)_sdata, _edata - _sdata,
> KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +#if defined(CONFIG_KFENCE) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE_STATIC_POOL)
> + /* KFENCE objects are located in .bss, which may confuse kmemleak. Skip them. */
> + create_object((unsigned long)__bss_start, __kfence_pool - __bss_start,
> + KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + create_object((unsigned long)__kfence_pool + KFENCE_POOL_SIZE,
> + __bss_stop - (__kfence_pool + KFENCE_POOL_SIZE),
> + KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +#else
> create_object((unsigned long)__bss_start, __bss_stop - __bss_start,
> KMEMLEAK_GREY, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +#endif

Could you instead do:

#if defined(CONFIG_KFENCE) && defined(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_KFENCE_STATIC_POOL)
delete_object_part((unsigned long)__kfence_pool, KFENCE_POOL_SIZE);
#endif

--
Catalin