Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] leds: pwm: Make automatic labels work

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> > > Besides: those suggestions are obviously valid for new bindings.  What
> > > about old bindings (.txt), which had no explicit SPDX tag or license note
> > > before? What license would apply there?  Is the .yaml file technically
> > > new, when it was mostly just converted from .txt?
> > 
> > If it is based on previous .txt binding, you have to respect previous
> > author's license. That probably means GPL-2.0 only.
> 
> Probably?

I have not checked exact licensing situation of that text, have not
decided if it was copyrightable in the first place, and am not a
lawyer.

So... probably :-).

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature