Re: remove set_fs for riscv v2

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Wed Sep 09 2020 - 16:39:07 EST

On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 23:55:15 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 09:59:29PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

The first four patches are general improvements and enablement for all nommu
ports, and might make sense to merge through the above base branch.

Seems like it to me. These won't work without the SET_FS code so I'm OK if you
guys want to keep them all together. Otherwise I think I'd need to wait until
the SET_FS stuff gets merged before taking any of these, which would be a bit
of a headache.

now that we've sorted out a remaining issue base.set_fs should not
be rebased any more, so you could pull it into the riscv tree or a topic

The first four patch should go into base.set_fs, though. Arnd, can you
re-review the updated patches?

OK, assuming the first four land through vfs I'll take the rest through my
tree. I wasn't sure it was OK to merge another subtree into my tree, as IIRC I
got told not to do something like that before, but I'll go figure out a sane
way to handle it.