Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] pwm: ntxec: Add driver for PWM function in Netronix EC

[Jonathan Neuschäfer]

On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:35:38AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:14 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sat, 05 Sep 2020, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, September 5, 2020, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@xxxxxxx>
[...]
> > > > > +       depends on MFD_NTXEC && OF
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I don’t see need to reduce test coverage and use of the driver by sticking
> > > > with OF. Actually it’s not used.
> > >
> > > If the device is only known to boot with OF, then it's pointless
> > > building it when !OF.
> > 
> > No, it's not. As I pointed out the (compilation) test coverage is better.
> 
> No, it's a waste of disk space.
> 
> Why would you knowingly compile something you know you can't use?
> 
> That's the whole point of COMPILE_TEST.
> 
> Note that when you want real coverage and you use `allyesconfig`
> and/or `allmodconfig` then CONFIG_OF is also enabled on platforms
> which support it.
> 
> > > If you want to increase test coverage enable
> > > COMPILE_TEST instead.
> > 
> > It is one way to achieve that, yes;
> > 
> >        depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> >        depends on MFD_NTXEC
> 
> This is better.

Ok, I'll go with this variant.


Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature