Re: [PATCH 00/11] mmc: Minor cleanups and compile test

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Fri Sep 11 2020 - 02:00:54 EST


On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 00:55, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 2:40 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 21:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Set of minor cleanups. Patches requiring more attention:
> > > - 6/11: Testing and review would be appreciated,
> > > - 11/11: I build tested multiple architectures but not all and
> > > definitely no all possible configs. This one could sit on the lists
> > > for few days so 0-day would try it.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Krzysztof
> > >
> > > Krzysztof Kozlowski (11):
> > > mmc: bcm2835: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: davinci: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: dw_mmc-zx: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: jz4740: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: meson: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: sdhci-brcmstb: Simplify with optional clock and dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: sdhci-tegra: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: dw_mmc: Simplify with dev_err_probe()
> > > mmc: sdhci-of-sparx5: Use proper printk format for dma_addr_t
> > > mmc: host: Enable compile testing of multiple drivers
> > >
> > > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 42 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> > > drivers/mmc/host/bcm2835.c | 4 +--
> > > drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c | 5 ++--
> > > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-zx.c | 11 +++-----
> > > drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 9 +++----
> > > drivers/mmc/host/jz4740_mmc.c | 5 ++--
> > > drivers/mmc/host/meson-gx-mmc.c | 16 ++++--------
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-brcmstb.c | 12 ++++-----
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 7 +++--
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-sparx5.c | 4 +--
> > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 7 ++---
> > > 11 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > Series applied for next, except 11, thanks!
>
> I see there's a bunch of these already, but I think we can do better
> here than dev_err_probe. We have _optional variants for the case not
> getting a resource is not an error. So the called functions like
> devm_clk_get can print an error. We already have this for
> platform_get_irq along with a coccinelle script to fix cases. I have a
> WIP branch[1] doing this.

That's quite good idea.

Best regards,
Krzysztof