Re: [PATCH] tulip: de2104x: switch from 'pci_' to 'dma_' API

From: Moritz Fischer
Date: Sun Sep 13 2020 - 12:28:03 EST


On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 02:44:53PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
>
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
>
> When memory is allocated in 'de_alloc_rings()' GFP_KERNEL can be used
> because it is only called from 'de_open()' which is a '.ndo_open'
> function. Such functions are synchronized using the rtnl_lock() semaphore
> and no lock is taken in the between.
>
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
> + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE
>
> @@
> @@
> - PCI_DMA_NONE
> + DMA_NONE
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_alloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3;
> @@
> - pci_zalloc_consistent(e1, e2, e3)
> + dma_alloc_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, GFP_)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_free_consistent(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_free_coherent(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_single(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_single(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4, e5;
> @@
> - pci_map_page(e1, e2, e3, e4, e5)
> + dma_map_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4, e5)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_page(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_page(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_map_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_map_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_unmap_sg(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_unmap_sg(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2, e3, e4;
> @@
> - pci_dma_sync_sg_for_device(e1, e2, e3, e4)
> + dma_sync_sg_for_device(&e1->dev, e2, e3, e4)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_dma_mapping_error(e1, e2)
> + dma_mapping_error(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> @@
> expression e1, e2;
> @@
> - pci_set_consistent_dma_mask(e1, e2)
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&e1->dev, e2)
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
> https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c | 62 ++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c
> index cb116b530f5e..0931881403b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c
> @@ -443,21 +443,23 @@ static void de_rx (struct de_private *de)
> }
>
> if (!copying_skb) {
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev, mapping,
> - buflen, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev, mapping, buflen,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> skb_put(skb, len);
>
> mapping =
> de->rx_skb[rx_tail].mapping =
> - pci_map_single(de->pdev, copy_skb->data,
> - buflen, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_map_single(&de->pdev->dev, copy_skb->data,
> + buflen, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> de->rx_skb[rx_tail].skb = copy_skb;
> } else {
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(de->pdev, mapping, len, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_sync_single_for_cpu(&de->pdev->dev, mapping, len,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> skb_reserve(copy_skb, RX_OFFSET);
> skb_copy_from_linear_data(skb, skb_put(copy_skb, len),
> len);
> - pci_dma_sync_single_for_device(de->pdev, mapping, len, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_sync_single_for_device(&de->pdev->dev, mapping,
> + len, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
>
> /* We'll reuse the original ring buffer. */
> skb = copy_skb;
> @@ -554,13 +556,15 @@ static void de_tx (struct de_private *de)
> goto next;
>
> if (unlikely(skb == DE_SETUP_SKB)) {
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev, de->tx_skb[tx_tail].mapping,
> - sizeof(de->setup_frame), PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev,
> + de->tx_skb[tx_tail].mapping,
> + sizeof(de->setup_frame),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> goto next;
> }
>
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev, de->tx_skb[tx_tail].mapping,
> - skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev, de->tx_skb[tx_tail].mapping,
> + skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
> if (status & LastFrag) {
> if (status & TxError) {
> @@ -620,7 +624,8 @@ static netdev_tx_t de_start_xmit (struct sk_buff *skb,
> txd = &de->tx_ring[entry];
>
> len = skb->len;
> - mapping = pci_map_single(de->pdev, skb->data, len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + mapping = dma_map_single(&de->pdev->dev, skb->data, len,
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> if (entry == (DE_TX_RING_SIZE - 1))
> flags |= RingEnd;
> if (!tx_free || (tx_free == (DE_TX_RING_SIZE / 2)))
> @@ -763,8 +768,8 @@ static void __de_set_rx_mode (struct net_device *dev)
>
> de->tx_skb[entry].skb = DE_SETUP_SKB;
> de->tx_skb[entry].mapping = mapping =
> - pci_map_single (de->pdev, de->setup_frame,
> - sizeof (de->setup_frame), PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + dma_map_single(&de->pdev->dev, de->setup_frame,
> + sizeof(de->setup_frame), DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
> /* Put the setup frame on the Tx list. */
> txd = &de->tx_ring[entry];
> @@ -1279,8 +1284,10 @@ static int de_refill_rx (struct de_private *de)
> if (!skb)
> goto err_out;
>
> - de->rx_skb[i].mapping = pci_map_single(de->pdev,
> - skb->data, de->rx_buf_sz, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + de->rx_skb[i].mapping = dma_map_single(&de->pdev->dev,
> + skb->data,
> + de->rx_buf_sz,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> de->rx_skb[i].skb = skb;
>
> de->rx_ring[i].opts1 = cpu_to_le32(DescOwn);
> @@ -1313,7 +1320,8 @@ static int de_init_rings (struct de_private *de)
>
> static int de_alloc_rings (struct de_private *de)
> {
> - de->rx_ring = pci_alloc_consistent(de->pdev, DE_RING_BYTES, &de->ring_dma);
> + de->rx_ring = dma_alloc_coherent(&de->pdev->dev, DE_RING_BYTES,
> + &de->ring_dma, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!de->rx_ring)
> return -ENOMEM;
> de->tx_ring = &de->rx_ring[DE_RX_RING_SIZE];
> @@ -1333,8 +1341,9 @@ static void de_clean_rings (struct de_private *de)
>
> for (i = 0; i < DE_RX_RING_SIZE; i++) {
> if (de->rx_skb[i].skb) {
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev, de->rx_skb[i].mapping,
> - de->rx_buf_sz, PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev,
> + de->rx_skb[i].mapping, de->rx_buf_sz,
> + DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> dev_kfree_skb(de->rx_skb[i].skb);
> }
> }
> @@ -1344,15 +1353,15 @@ static void de_clean_rings (struct de_private *de)
> if ((skb) && (skb != DE_DUMMY_SKB)) {
> if (skb != DE_SETUP_SKB) {
> de->dev->stats.tx_dropped++;
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev,
> - de->tx_skb[i].mapping,
> - skb->len, PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev,
> + de->tx_skb[i].mapping,
> + skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> } else {
> - pci_unmap_single(de->pdev,
> - de->tx_skb[i].mapping,
> - sizeof(de->setup_frame),
> - PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
> + dma_unmap_single(&de->pdev->dev,
> + de->tx_skb[i].mapping,
> + sizeof(de->setup_frame),
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1364,7 +1373,8 @@ static void de_clean_rings (struct de_private *de)
> static void de_free_rings (struct de_private *de)
> {
> de_clean_rings(de);
> - pci_free_consistent(de->pdev, DE_RING_BYTES, de->rx_ring, de->ring_dma);
> + dma_free_coherent(&de->pdev->dev, DE_RING_BYTES, de->rx_ring,
> + de->ring_dma);
> de->rx_ring = NULL;
> de->tx_ring = NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Thanks,
Moritz