Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: make linux-usb list remarks consistent

[Lukas Bulwahn]

On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Joe Perches wrote:

> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 14:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > > 
> > > > This patch submission will also show me if linux-usb is moderated or not.
> > > > I have not subscribed to linux-usb and if it shows up quickly in the
> > > > archive, the list is probably not moderated, and hence, validating the
> > > > patch.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The patch showed up in the archives within seconds:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-usb/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/
> > > 
> > > So, the linux-usb list is most likely not moderated. Patch validated.
> > 
> > Yes, it is not moderated, and never has been, no idea where that idea came from.
> 
> There's also linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> that is listed as moderated
> 
> Are any of the vger lists actually moderated?
>  


Joe, I found these five list entries with inconsistent remarks:

- linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912121346.2796-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/  (the patch here)

- linux-aspeed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200912183334.22683-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/

- linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914053110.23286-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/
    - initial patch here was wrong.
    - waiting for somebody to confirm that it is not moderated to then 
send the correct patch.

- linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
  - Patch: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200914061353.17535-1-lukas.bulwahn@xxxxxxxxx/

- linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
  - by 'majority vote' (131 vs. 27), it is probably moderated.
  - no patch sent yet; patch will follow once the others are accepted.

Then, more patches on adding 'exploders for non-subscribers' remarks will 
follow.


Lukas