[RFC PATCH 29/35] KVM: SVM: Add NMI support for an SEV-ES guest

[Tom Lendacky]

From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>

The GHCB specification defines how NMIs are to be handled for an SEV-ES
guest. To detect the completion of an NMI the hypervisor must not
intercept the IRET instruction (because a #VC while running the NMI will
issue an IRET) and, instead, must receive an NMI Complete exit event from
the guest.

Update the KVM support for detecting the completion of NMIs in the guest
to follow the GHCB specification. When an SEV-ES guest is active, the
IRET instruction will no longer be intercepted. Now, when the NMI Complete
exit event is received, the iret_interception() function will be called
to simulate the completion of the NMI.

Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index cbb5f1b191bb..9bf7411a4b5d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -1474,6 +1474,9 @@ int sev_handle_vmgexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 					    control->exit_info_2,
 					    svm->ghcb_sa);
 		break;
+	case SVM_VMGEXIT_NMI_COMPLETE:
+		ret = svm_invoke_exit_handler(svm, SVM_EXIT_IRET);
+		break;
 	case SVM_VMGEXIT_AP_HLT_LOOP:
 		svm->ap_hlt_loop = true;
 		ret = kvm_emulate_halt(&svm->vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index ce1707dc9464..fcd4f0d983e9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2268,9 +2268,11 @@ static int cpuid_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 static int iret_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 {
 	++svm->vcpu.stat.nmi_window_exits;
-	svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
 	svm->vcpu.arch.hflags |= HF_IRET_MASK;
-	svm->nmi_iret_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu);
+	if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm)) {
+		svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
+		svm->nmi_iret_rip = kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu);
+	}
 	kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, &svm->vcpu);
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -3242,7 +3244,8 @@ static void svm_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	svm->vmcb->control.event_inj = SVM_EVTINJ_VALID | SVM_EVTINJ_TYPE_NMI;
 	vcpu->arch.hflags |= HF_NMI_MASK;
-	svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
+	if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
+		svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
 	++vcpu->stat.nmi_injections;
 }
 
@@ -3326,10 +3329,12 @@ static void svm_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
 
 	if (masked) {
 		svm->vcpu.arch.hflags |= HF_NMI_MASK;
-		svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
+		if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
+			svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
 	} else {
 		svm->vcpu.arch.hflags &= ~HF_NMI_MASK;
-		svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
+		if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
+			svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -3507,8 +3512,9 @@ static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
 	 * If we've made progress since setting HF_IRET_MASK, we've
 	 * executed an IRET and can allow NMI injection.
 	 */
-	if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_IRET_MASK)
-	    && kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) != svm->nmi_iret_rip) {
+	if ((svm->vcpu.arch.hflags & HF_IRET_MASK) &&
+	    (sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm) ||
+	     kvm_rip_read(&svm->vcpu) != svm->nmi_iret_rip)) {
 		svm->vcpu.arch.hflags &= ~(HF_NMI_MASK | HF_IRET_MASK);
 		kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, &svm->vcpu);
 	}
-- 
2.28.0