Re: [tip:x86/seves] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING e6eb15c9ba3165698488ae5c34920eea20eaa38e

[Marco Elver]

On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 23:28, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:13:01PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > Triple checking what I wrote above; it looks like the randconfig had
> > BOTH CONFIG_KASAN=y and CONFIG_UBSAN=y enabled.  Aren't the sanitizers
> > supposed to be mutually exclusive?  If so, we should ensure that via
> > kconfig these can't be selected together via randconfig.
>
> No idea...

They are not mutually exclusive. The big ones like KASAN/KCSAN/KMSAN
are mutually exclusive (compiler complains if you mix the flags), but
UBSAN can be enabled with other sanitizers (and fsanitize-coverage,
although not strictly a "sanitizer" it's still instrumentation based).
In general, we shouldn't artificially disallow mixing them if it's
supported by the compiler and our runtime can handle it.

I'll have a look at the rest tomorrow (UBSAN_TRAP stuff, which
coincidentally also came up in some other patch).

Thanks,
-- Marco