Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the dma-mapping tree
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Wed Sep 16 2020 - 00:35:32 EST
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 04:22:03AM +0000, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
> > c999bd436fe9 ("mm/cma: make number of CMA areas dynamic, remove
> > CONFIG_CMA_AREAS")
> >
> > from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I guess this is because Mike's patch was written on top of dma-mapping's next branch.
It wasn't.
> Will it be better to go through Christoph's tree?
I don't think this merge is much of a problem, we'll just need to tell
Linus about it.