Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] seqlock: Introduce PREEMPT_RT support
From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Wed Sep 16 2020 - 22:31:56 EST
Hi all,
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:02:33 +0200 peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:00:59AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 08:52:07AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2020-09-15 at 16:30 +0200, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:48:17PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > > > > > I think this happened because seqcount_##lockname##_init() is defined
> > > > > > at
> > > > > > function rather than macro, so when the seqcount_init() gets expand in
> > > > >
> > > > > Bah! I hate all this :/
> > > > >
> > > > > I suspect the below, while more verbose than I'd like is the best
> > > > > option.
> > > >
> > > > Stephen, can you add this patch for now until Peter beats you to it?
> > >
> > > Did you verify it works? I only wrote it..
> >
> > Yes, I did.
>
> Excellent, I'll stick a Tested-by from you on then.
I'll add this into the tip tree merge today (unless the tip tree is
updated in the mean time).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgp_zfupqtr_f.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature