Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Changing vma->vm_file in dma_buf_mmap()

[Christian König]

Am 17.09.20 um 14:18 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:03:48PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 17.09.20 um 13:31 schrieb Jason Gunthorpe:
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:09:12AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > > Yeah, but it doesn't work when forwarding from the drm chardev to the
> > > > dma-buf on the importer side, since you'd need a ton of different
> > > > address spaces. And you still rely on the core code picking up your
> > > > pgoff mangling, which feels about as risky to me as the vma file
> > > > pointer wrangling - if it's not consistently applied the reverse map
> > > > is toast and unmap_mapping_range doesn't work correctly for our needs.
> > > I would think the pgoff has to be translated at the same time the
> > > vm->vm_file is changed?
> > >
> > > The owner of the dma_buf should have one virtual address space and FD,
> > > all its dma bufs should be linked to it, and all pgoffs translated to
> > > that space.
> > Yeah, that is exactly like amdgpu is doing it.
> >
> > Going to document that somehow when I'm done with TTM cleanups.
> BTW, while people are looking at this, is there a way to go from a VMA
> to a dma_buf that owns it?

Only a driver specific one.

For TTM drivers vma->vm_private_data points to the buffer object. Not 
sure about the drivers using GEM only.

Why are you asking?

Regards,
Christian.

> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig