Re: [PATCH v7 33/34] i2c: tegra: Clean up whitespaces, newlines and indentation
From: Thierry Reding
Date: Thu Sep 17 2020 - 08:40:40 EST
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:40:05AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Some places in the code are missing newlines or have unnecessary
> whitespaces and newlines. This creates inconsistency of the code and
> hurts readability. This patch removes the unnecessary and adds necessary
> whitespaces / newlines, clears indentation of the code.
>
> Reviewed-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> index 31fbc6181dd5..087f98010963 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
> @@ -314,6 +314,7 @@ static u32 tegra_i2c_reg_addr(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 reg)
> reg += (reg >= I2C_TX_FIFO) ? 0x10 : 0x40;
> else if (i2c_dev->is_vi)
> reg = 0xc00 + (reg << 2);
> +
> return reg;
> }
>
> @@ -373,9 +374,12 @@ static int tegra_i2c_dma_submit(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, size_t len)
> struct dma_chan *chan;
>
> dev_dbg(i2c_dev->dev, "starting DMA for length: %zu\n", len);
> +
> reinit_completion(&i2c_dev->dma_complete);
> +
> dir = i2c_dev->msg_read ? DMA_DEV_TO_MEM : DMA_MEM_TO_DEV;
> chan = i2c_dev->msg_read ? i2c_dev->rx_dma_chan : i2c_dev->tx_dma_chan;
> +
> dma_desc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(chan, i2c_dev->dma_phys,
> len, dir, DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT |
> DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> @@ -387,8 +391,10 @@ static int tegra_i2c_dma_submit(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, size_t len)
>
> dma_desc->callback = tegra_i2c_dma_complete;
> dma_desc->callback_param = i2c_dev;
> +
> dmaengine_submit(dma_desc);
> dma_async_issue_pending(chan);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -455,6 +461,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_init_dma(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>
> i2c_dev->dma_buf = dma_buf;
> i2c_dev->dma_phys = dma_phys;
> +
> return 0;
>
> err_out:
> @@ -557,6 +564,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_flush_fifos(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> dev_err(i2c_dev->dev, "failed to flush FIFO\n");
> return err;
> }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -650,8 +658,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_init(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> if (i2c_dev->hw->has_interface_timing_reg && tsu_thd)
> i2c_writel(i2c_dev, tsu_thd, I2C_INTERFACE_TIMING_1);
>
> - clk_multiplier = tlow + thigh + 2;
> - clk_multiplier *= non_hs_mode + 1;
> + clk_multiplier = (tlow + thigh + 2) * (non_hs_mode + 1);
>
> err = clk_set_rate(i2c_dev->div_clk,
> i2c_dev->bus_clk_rate * clk_multiplier);
> @@ -799,9 +806,9 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> */
> buf_remaining -= words_to_transfer * BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
> tx_fifo_avail -= words_to_transfer;
> +
> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
> - i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf +
> - words_to_transfer * BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
> + i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer * BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
>
> i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO, words_to_transfer);
>
> @@ -914,12 +921,18 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> goto done;
> err:
> /* mask all interrupts on error */
> - tegra_i2c_mask_irq(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_NO_ACK | I2C_INT_ARBITRATION_LOST |
> - I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE | I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ |
> - I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ);
> + tegra_i2c_mask_irq(i2c_dev,
> + I2C_INT_NO_ACK |
> + I2C_INT_ARBITRATION_LOST |
> + I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE |
> + I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ |
> + I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ);
This now seems inconsistent with the choice in other places in this
driver where we wrap only when necessary. I think it would be more
consistent to align the subsequent lines with the parameters on the
first line. Or alternatively assign to a local variable and pass that to
tegra_i2c_mask_irq().
But the above is fine with me as well:
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature