[PATCH 2/2] locktorture: call percpu_free_rwsem() to do percpu-rwsem cleanup

[Hou Tao]

When do percpu-rwsem writer lock torture, the RCU callback
rcu_sync_func() may still be pending after locktorture module
is removed, and it will lead to the following Oops:

  BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc00eb920
  #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
  #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
  PGD 6500a067 P4D 6500a067 PUD 6500c067 PMD 13a36c067 PTE 800000013691c163
  Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
  CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc5+ #4
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
  RIP: 0010:rcu_cblist_dequeue+0x12/0x30
  Call Trace:
   <IRQ>
   rcu_core+0x1b1/0x860
   __do_softirq+0xfe/0x326
   asm_call_on_stack+0x12/0x20
   </IRQ>
   do_softirq_own_stack+0x5f/0x80
   irq_exit_rcu+0xaf/0xc0
   sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x2e/0xb0
   asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20

Fix it by adding an exit hook in lock_torture_ops and
use it to call percpu_free_rwsem() for percpu rwsem torture
before the module is removed, so we can ensure rcu_sync_func()
completes before module exits.

Also needs to call exit hook if lock_torture_init() fails half-way,
so use ctx->cur_ops != NULL to signal that init hook has been called.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index bebdf98e6cd78..e91033e9b6f95 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void);
  */
 struct lock_torture_ops {
 	void (*init)(void);
+	void (*exit)(void);
 	int (*writelock)(void);
 	void (*write_delay)(struct torture_random_state *trsp);
 	void (*task_boost)(struct torture_random_state *trsp);
@@ -571,6 +572,11 @@ void torture_percpu_rwsem_init(void)
 	BUG_ON(percpu_init_rwsem(&pcpu_rwsem));
 }
 
+static void torture_percpu_rwsem_exit(void)
+{
+	percpu_free_rwsem(&pcpu_rwsem);
+}
+
 static int torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write(void) __acquires(pcpu_rwsem)
 {
 	percpu_down_write(&pcpu_rwsem);
@@ -595,6 +601,7 @@ static void torture_percpu_rwsem_up_read(void) __releases(pcpu_rwsem)
 
 static struct lock_torture_ops percpu_rwsem_lock_ops = {
 	.init		= torture_percpu_rwsem_init,
+	.exit		= torture_percpu_rwsem_exit,
 	.writelock	= torture_percpu_rwsem_down_write,
 	.write_delay	= torture_rwsem_write_delay,
 	.task_boost     = torture_boost_dummy,
@@ -786,9 +793,10 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * Indicates early cleanup, meaning that the test has not run,
-	 * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module. As
-	 * such, only perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups,
-	 * and avoid anything related to locktorture.
+	 * such as when passing bogus args when loading the module.
+	 * However cxt->cur_ops.init() may have been invoked, so beside
+	 * perform the underlying torture-specific cleanups, cur_ops.exit()
+	 * will be invoked if needed.
 	 */
 	if (!cxt.lwsa && !cxt.lrsa)
 		goto end;
@@ -828,6 +836,12 @@ static void lock_torture_cleanup(void)
 	cxt.lrsa = NULL;
 
 end:
+	/* If init() has been called, then do exit() accordingly */
+	if (cxt.cur_ops) {
+		if (cxt.cur_ops->exit)
+			cxt.cur_ops->exit();
+		cxt.cur_ops = NULL;
+	}
 	torture_cleanup_end();
 }
 
@@ -835,6 +849,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 {
 	int i, j;
 	int firsterr = 0;
+	struct lock_torture_ops *cur_ops;
 	static struct lock_torture_ops *torture_ops[] = {
 		&lock_busted_ops,
 		&spin_lock_ops, &spin_lock_irq_ops,
@@ -853,8 +868,8 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 
 	/* Process args and tell the world that the torturer is on the job. */
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops); i++) {
-		cxt.cur_ops = torture_ops[i];
-		if (strcmp(torture_type, cxt.cur_ops->name) == 0)
+		cur_ops = torture_ops[i];
+		if (strcmp(torture_type, cur_ops->name) == 0)
 			break;
 	}
 	if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(torture_ops)) {
@@ -869,12 +884,13 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
 	}
 
 	if (nwriters_stress == 0 &&
-	    (!cxt.cur_ops->readlock || nreaders_stress == 0)) {
+	    (!cur_ops->readlock || nreaders_stress == 0)) {
 		pr_alert("lock-torture: must run at least one locking thread\n");
 		firsterr = -EINVAL;
 		goto unwind;
 	}
 
+	cxt.cur_ops = cur_ops;
 	if (cxt.cur_ops->init)
 		cxt.cur_ops->init();
 
-- 
2.25.0.4.g0ad7144999