Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device via software nodes on ACPI platforms
From: Kieran Bingham
Date: Thu Sep 17 2020 - 10:22:28 EST
On 17/09/2020 15:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM Kieran Bingham
> <kieran.bingham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 17/09/2020 10:47, Dan Scally wrote:
>>> On 17/09/2020 08:53, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:36:18PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
>>>>> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig | 15 +
>>>>> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>> drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 448 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Why does this have to be in drivers/staging/ at all? Why not spend the
>>>> time to fix it up properly and get it merged correctly? It's a very
>>>> small driver, and should be smaller, so it should not be a lot of work
>>>> to do. And it would be faster to do that than to take it through
>>> I was just under the impression that that was the process to be honest,
>>> if that's not right I'll just move it directly to drivers/media/ipu3
>> The IPU3 driver is still in staging (unless I've missed something), so I
>> think this cio2-bridge should stay with it.
> You missed something.
> IPU3 from Freescale (IIRC) is a different story.
Ayee, ok so we have 'half' the driver for IPU3 out of staging.
>From my understanding, the IPU3 consists of two components, the CIO2
(CSI2 capture), and the IMGU (the ISP).
This is indeed the CIO2 component (config VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2), and that is
the part that this bridge relates to, so in fact this cio2-bridge should
probably go there indeed. No need to go through staging.
The files remaining at:
are in fact also for the IPU3 but the ISP component (VIDEO_IPU3_IMGU).
I'm sorry for the confusion, I knew that the ISP was still in staging, I
hadn't realised the CSI2 receiver (CIO2) was not.
>> Hopefully with more users of the IPU3 brought in by this cio2-bridge,
>> that will help gather momentum to get the IPU3 developments required
>> completed and moved into drivers/media.