Re: [PATCH 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR_IAL flag

[Uwe Kleine-König]

Hello,

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 02:20:27PM +0200, Christian Eggers wrote:
> According to the "VFxxx Controller Reference Manual" (and the comment
> block starting at line 97), Vybrid requires writing a one for clearing
> an interrupt flag. Syncing with the method for clearing I2SR_IIF in
> i2c_imx_isr().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> index 0ab5381aa012..d8b2e632dd10 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ static int i2c_imx_bus_busy(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, int for_busy, bool a
>  		/* check for arbitration lost */
>  		if (temp & I2SR_IAL) {
>  			temp &= ~I2SR_IAL;
> +			temp |= (i2c_imx->hwdata->i2sr_clr_opcode & I2SR_IAL);
>  			imx_i2c_write_reg(temp, i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
>  			return -EAGAIN;

This looks strange. First the flag is cleared and then it is (in some
cases) set again.

If I2SR_IIF is set in temp you ack this irq without handling it. (Which
might happen if atomic is set and irqs are off?!)

I see this idiom is used in a few more places in the driver already, I
didn't check but these might have the same problem maybe?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature