Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: mfd: rohm,bd71837-pmic: Add common properties

[Vaittinen, Matti]

Hi deeee Ho peeps!

On Thu, 2020-09-17 at 21:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Add common properties appearing in DTSes (clock-names,
> clock-output-names) with the common values (actually used in DTSes)
> to
> fix dtbs_check warnings like:
> 
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-librem5-r2.dt.yaml:
>     pmic@4b: 'clock-names', 'clock-output-names', do not match any of
> the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 1. Define the names, as used in existing DTS files.
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.yaml          | 6
> ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-
> pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-
> pmic.yaml
> index 65018a019e1d..3bfdd33702ad 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd71837-pmic.yaml
> @@ -32,9 +32,15 @@ properties:
>    clocks:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  clock-names:
> +    const: osc

I guess existing board dtses use "osc" then? Ok.

>    "#clock-cells":
>      const: 0
>  
> +  clock-output-names:
> +    const: pmic_clk

This is not a strong opinion but I feel that pmic_clk is a bit too
generic name? I mean, what if there is a system with more than one
PMICs? (I don't see such use-case with the BD718x7 though - but perhaps
this can serve as a misleading example for other PMICs? For example
with the ROHM BD96801 family there may be multiple PMICs in one
system). Anyways - if Rob is happy with this then please go with it :)

Acked-By: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 * 
Thanks again for improving these bindings! I am constantly struggling
with these x_x. Writing the bindings is probably hardest part of PMIC
driver development -_-;