Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Add kexec/kdump support

From: Huacai Chen
Date: Fri Sep 18 2020 - 23:59:34 EST

Next message: Muchun Song: "Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] tasklet: Introduce tasklet tracepoints"
Previous message: Jing Xiangfeng: "[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove redundant assignment to variable ret"
In reply to: Jinyang He: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Add kexec/kdump support"
Next in thread: Jiaxun Yang: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Add kexec/kdump support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi, Jinyang,

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:20 PM Jinyang He <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 09/17/2020 09:52 PM, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > 在 2020/9/17 下午8:41, Jinyang He 写道:
> >> Hi, Huacai,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/16/2020 01:39 PM, Huacai Chen wrote:
> >>> Hi, Jinyang,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 10:17 PM Jinyang He <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 09/16/2020 09:33 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >>>>> 于 2020年9月15日 GMT+08:00 下午9:07:43, Jinyang He
> >>>>> <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> 写到:
> >>>>>> Add loongson_kexec_prepare(), loongson_kexec_shutdown() and
> >>>>>> loongson_kexec_crashdown() for passing the parameters of kexec_args.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To start loongson64, CPU0 needs 3 parameters:
> >>>>>> fw_arg0: the number of cmd.
> >>>>>> fw_arg1: cmd structure which seems strange, the cmd array[index]'s
> >>>>>> value is cmd string's address, index >= 1.
> >>>>>> fw_arg2: environment.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Secondary CPUs do not need parameter at once. They query their
> >>>>>> mailbox to get PC, SP and GP in a loop before CPU0 brings them up
> >>>>>> and passes these parameters via mailbox.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> loongson_kexec_prepare(): Alloc new memory to save cmd for kexec.
> >>>>>> Combine the kexec append option string as cmd structure, and the cmd
> >>>>>> struct will be parsed in fw_init_cmdline() of
> >>>>>> arch/mips/fw/lib/cmdline.c.
> >>>>>> image->control_code_page need pointing to a safe memory page. In
> >>>>>> order to
> >>>>>> maintain compatibility for the old firmware the low 2MB is reserverd
> >>>>>> and safe for Loongson. So let it points here.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> loongson_kexec_shutdown(): Wake up all present CPUs and let them go
> >>>>>> to reboot_code_buffer. Pass the kexec parameters to kexec_args.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> loongson_crash_shutdown(): Pass the kdump parameters to kexec_args.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The assembly part provide a way like BIOS doing to keep secondary
> >>>>>> CPUs in a querying loop.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch referenced [1][2][3].
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [1] arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c
> >>>>>> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10799217/
> >>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>> https://gitee.com/loongsonlab/qemu/blob/master/hw/mips/loongson3a_rom.h
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Co-developed-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> arch/mips/kernel/relocate_kernel.S | 19 ++++++++
> >>>>>> arch/mips/loongson64/reset.c | 88
> >>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/relocate_kernel.S
> >>>>>> b/arch/mips/kernel/relocate_kernel.S
> >>>>>> index ac87089..061cbfb 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/relocate_kernel.S
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/relocate_kernel.S
> >>>>>> @@ -133,6 +133,25 @@ LEAF(kexec_smp_wait)
> >>>>>> #else
> >>>>>> sync
> >>>>>> #endif
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_LOONGSON64
> >>>>>> +#define MAILBOX_BASE 0x900000003ff01000
> >>>>> Please avoid hardcoded SMP information. You're breaking Loongson
> >>>>> 3B support.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Ok, I see. Since my machine is Loongson 3A. I'll send v2
> >>>> after I test it in 3B.
> >>> 1, My original version can work on both Loongson-3A and Loongson-3B,
> >>> why you modify my patch and hadn't discuss with me?
> >>>
> >>> 2, With this single patch both kexec and kdump cannot work reliably,
> >>> because kexec need this patch:
> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11695929/
> >>>
> >>> and kdump need my first patch in my original version:
> >>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10799215/
> >>>
> >>> You may argue that you have tested. Yes, I believe that, I'm not
> >>> saying that you haven't test, and I'm not saying that your patch
> >>> cannot work, I'm just saying that your patch is not robust.
> >>>
> >>> 3, I'm the original author and paying attention to kexec/kdump
> >>> continuosly, I will send a new version once the above two patches be
> >>> accepted. But you re-send my patch without any communication with me,
> >>> why you so impatient?
> >>>
> >>> Huacai
> >>>
> >>
> >> 1, Your original version:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10799217/
> >>
> >> This patch can work on Loongson-3A, I tested it.
> >>
> >> But it works wrong after the follow behaviors,
> >> kexec -l vmlinux --append=cmdline_kexec
> >> kexec -p vmlinux --append=cmdline_kdump
> >> kexec -e
> >>
> >
> > What 's wrong with you Loongson guys? Why do you always send patches
> > with the same functions as the original author withou any
> > communication with the original author? Especially the original author
> > of the patch is the maintainer of Loongson64 architecture.
>
> Hi,
>
> Just take it easy, try to keep calm and do not panic.
>
> You do not understand the story, the background, what happened before,
> and what happens next, so please let me express my opinion.
>
> When I use the mainline kernel on the Loongson platform, I find kexec
> can not work well and I feel depressed, so I analyse and debug the
> related code, the initial aim of all my effort is to make it work well.
>
> In order to create the positive environment of community participation,
> I have two questions to discuss:
> (1) If there exists a similar patch which is submitted more than one
> year ago but has not been merged into the mainline tree, could the
> newcomers do the similar work to support the same feature? I think the
> answer is yes, right?
> (2) When the newcomers submit the new patch to community, what should
> be done to avoid an unhappy time? I think this is the nature of the
> problem, add "Originally-by:" tag? What do you think of it?
>
> I think we should consider what is the proper attitude to welcome and
> encourage newcomers, however terrible or wrong things they did,
> everyone needs to have a process of growth, right?
>
> Positive and well-meant suggestions would be much more helpful and
> useful to the community in the long run.
>
Here is an example:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11433713/

The original author of the audit patch is Ralf, he sent a patch more
than 5 years ago, and in the past 5 years I maintained it. This patch
is very different from his original version now.
However, I didn't modify the author information, so you can see a
"From:" line at the header, the result is git log will still show the
original author, whether this patch is sent by Ralf or by me.
Moreover, I hadn't removed his signed-off, even if he has done nothing
in the past 5 years.

For the kexec patch, my suggestion is that you can wait for me to send
a new version after my pciportdrv patch is accepted, I will add your
signed-off (if your advantages are taken in my new version).

At last, you must thank Zhou Yanjie, he is teaching you how to join
the community in a right manner, even if you think he is angry. Your
behavior may make anyone angry, unless those people don't care about
MIPS. "Newcomer" is not your reason, you have many colleagues in the
MIPS community (such as Tiezhu), right? They should have already
taught you how to join the community, right?

If you want Loongson to be upstream, remember that Loongson is not
only "Loongson of the Loongson Inc.", but also "Loongson of the
world". Don't make Loongson be an orphan of the mainstream, and stop
doing GPL violation.

Best regards,
Huacai

>
> >
> > In the past year, Loongson employees have been very active. This is a
> > happy thing, but at the same time, it is confusing that, in addition
> > to always sending patches that others have already sent, many patches
> > send by Loongson employees often with only a few lines (less than 10
> > lines). I don't think this is a normal phenomenon, is this caused by
> > any other factors? Such as KPIs? If the patches are submitted for this
> > purpose, it is not advisable, this behavior will harm the entire
> > Loongson.
>
> Each patch we submitted is to make the kernel code better and better,
> even if it is a small cleanup patch.
>
> >
> >
> >> It works but cmdline_kdump merged cmdline_kexec.
> >>
> >> And this patch memcpy from fw_arg2 to kexec_envp and later memcpy from
> >> kexec_envp to fw_arg2 when fw_arg2 was not changed, it's redundant.
> >>
> >> However, I have not Loongson-3B now, and did not test it. For this
> >> patch,
> >> does it work well on Loongson-3B3000/Loongson-3B4000?
> >>
> >> 2, I have known that problem before your patch:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11695929/
> >>
> >> I also did efforts although I had't committed my patch. It's due to the
> >> hardware issues, and I removed pcie_port_device_remove(). Kexec works
> >> normally on GUI. But it works terriblely on CLI. After this discuss:
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1304917/
> >>
> >> What Lukas said helped me. I removed
> >> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c: pci_device_shutdown(): pci_clear_master...
> >> Kexec works well on CLI also.
> >>
> >> For another patch:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10799215/
> >>
> >> I have not 2way or 4way machine, and I did not test it.
> >>
> >> 3, I try to fix Loongson64 kexec function since I joined the community.
> >> I fell sorry to not do enough research on Loongson64 kexec. My first
> >> patch:
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11684849/
> >>
> >> It fixed problem about "Crash kernel" which can be traced back to
> >> linux-5.4.
> >> At that time, I thought there is no developer work on Kexec. Thus, I
> >> did a
> >> lot on Kexec. Are you really continuosly paying attention to
> >> kexec/kdump?
> >> With the exploring and developing deep, I found your patch several
> >> days ago
> >> after I did a draft patch witch referenced:
> >> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/setup.c
> >> https://gitee.com/loongsonlab/qemu/blob/master/hw/mips/loongson3a_rom.h
> >>
> >> There is no doubt that your patch gives me confidence and suggestion
> >> while
> >> it gives me worry. As a newcomer, I do not know if should communicate
> >> with
> >> you since your patch was committed one year ago. And now it may be a
> >> good
> >> chance to do some communication.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> - Jinyang.
> >>
> >>>>>> + mfc0 t1, CP0_EBASE
> >>>>>> + andi t1, MIPS_EBASE_CPUNUM
> >>>>>> + dli t0, MAILBOX_BASE
> >>>>>> + andi t3, t1, 0x3
> >>>>>> + sll t3, 8
> >>>>>> + or t0, t0, t3 /* insert core id */
> >>>>>> + andi t2, t1, 0xc
> >>>>>> + dsll t2, 42
> >>>>>> + or t0, t0, t2 /* insert node id */
> >>>>>> +1: ld s1, 0x20(t0) /* get PC via mailbox0 */
> >>>>>> + beqz s1, 1b
> >>>>>> + ld sp, 0x28(t0) /* get SP via mailbox1 */
> >>>>>> + ld gp, 0x30(t0) /* get GP via mailbox2 */
> >>>>>> + ld a1, 0x38(t0)
> >>>>>> + jr s1
> >>>>>> +#endif
> >>>>>> j s1
> >>>>>> END(kexec_smp_wait)
> >>>>>> #endif
> >>>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/loongson64/reset.c
> >>>>>> b/arch/mips/loongson64/reset.c
> >>>>>> index 3bb8a1e..322c326 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/arch/mips/loongson64/reset.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/loongson64/reset.c
> >>>>>> @@ -47,12 +47,100 @@ static void loongson_halt(void)
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> >>>>>> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> >>>>>> +#include <linux/kexec.h>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#include <asm/bootinfo.h>
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +#define CONTROL_CODE_PAGE 0xFFFFFFFF80000000UL
> >>>>>> +static int kexec_argc;
> >>>>>> +static int kdump_argc;
> >>>>>> +static void *kexec_argv;
> >>>>>> +static void *kdump_argv;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static int loongson_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + int i, offt, argc = 0;
> >>>>>> + int *argv;
> >>>>>> + char *str, *ptr, *bootloader = "kexec";
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + argv = kmalloc(COMMAND_LINE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>> + if (!argv)
> >>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + for (i = 0; i < image->nr_segments; i++) {
> >>>>>> + if (!strncmp(bootloader, (char *)image->segment[i].buf,
> >>>>>> + strlen(bootloader))) {
> >>>>>> + argv[argc++] = fw_arg1 + COMMAND_LINE_SIZE/2;
> >>>>>> + str = (char *)argv + COMMAND_LINE_SIZE/2;
> >>>>>> + memcpy(str, image->segment[i].buf,
> >>>>>> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE/2);
> >>>>>> + ptr = strchr(str, ' ');
> >>>>>> + while (ptr) {
> >>>>>> + *ptr = '\0';
> >>>>>> + if (ptr[1] != ' ') {
> >>>>>> + offt = (int)(ptr - str + 1);
> >>>>>> + argv[argc++] = fw_arg1 +
> >>>>>> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE/2 + offt;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + ptr = strchr(ptr + 1, ' ');
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + break;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + /* Kexec/kdump needs a safe page to save reboot_code_buffer. */
> >>>>>> + image->control_code_page = virt_to_page((void
> >>>>>> *)CONTROL_CODE_PAGE);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (image->type == KEXEC_TYPE_CRASH) {
> >>>>>> + kfree(kdump_argv);
> >>>>>> + kdump_argc = argc;
> >>>>>> + kdump_argv = argv;
> >>>>>> + } else {
> >>>>>> + kfree(kexec_argv);
> >>>>>> + kexec_argc = argc;
> >>>>>> + kexec_argv = argv;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static void loongson_kexec_shutdown(void)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >>>>>> + bringup_nonboot_cpus(loongson_sysconf.nr_cpus);
> >>>>>> +#endif
> >>>>>> + fw_arg0 = kexec_argc;
> >>>>>> + memcpy((void *)fw_arg1, kexec_argv, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[0] = fw_arg0;
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[1] = fw_arg1;
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[2] = fw_arg2;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +static void loongson_crash_shutdown(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + default_machine_crash_shutdown(regs);
> >>>>>> + fw_arg0 = kdump_argc;
> >>>>>> + memcpy((void *)fw_arg1, kdump_argv, COMMAND_LINE_SIZE);
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[0] = fw_arg0;
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[1] = fw_arg1;
> >>>>>> + kexec_args[2] = fw_arg2;
> >>>>>> +}
> >>>>>> +#endif
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> static int __init mips_reboot_setup(void)
> >>>>>> {
> >>>>>> _machine_restart = loongson_restart;
> >>>>>> _machine_halt = loongson_halt;
> >>>>>> pm_power_off = loongson_poweroff;
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> >>>>>> + _machine_kexec_prepare = loongson_kexec_prepare;
> >>>>>> + _machine_kexec_shutdown = loongson_kexec_shutdown;
> >>>>>> + _machine_crash_shutdown = loongson_crash_shutdown;
> >>>>>> +#endif
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> return 0;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
>

Next message: Muchun Song: "Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] tasklet: Introduce tasklet tracepoints"
Previous message: Jing Xiangfeng: "[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove redundant assignment to variable ret"
In reply to: Jinyang He: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Add kexec/kdump support"
Next in thread: Jiaxun Yang: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Loongson64: Add kexec/kdump support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]