Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: fix unregister GISC when KVM is already gone results in OOPS

From: Cornelia Huck
Date: Mon Sep 21 2020 - 05:23:33 EST


On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:02:34 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attempting to unregister Guest Interruption Subclass (GISC) when the
> link between the matrix mdev and KVM has been removed results in the
> following:
>
> "Kernel panic -not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops"

I'm wondering how we get there (why are we unregistering the gisc if
the mdev and kvm are not yet linked or are already unlinked?), so I
agree that the actual backchain would be helpful here.

>
> This patch fixes this bug by verifying the matrix mdev and KVM are still
> linked prior to unregistering the GISC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e0bde8518745..847a88642644 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -119,11 +119,15 @@ static void vfio_ap_wait_for_irqclear(int apqn)
> */
> static void vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
> {
> - if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev)

If checking for ->kvm is the right thing to do, I agree that moving the
check here would be easier to read.

> - kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->saved_isc);
> - if (q->saved_pfn && q->matrix_mdev)
> - vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> - &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> + if (q->matrix_mdev) {
> + if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev->kvm)
> + kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm,
> + q->saved_isc);
> + if (q->saved_pfn)
> + vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> + &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> + }
> +
> q->saved_pfn = 0;
> q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
> }