[PATCH 4.9 06/70] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 ]

When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 850e75571c8ee..bb1e878913f3a 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 	rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
 	if (rc) {
 		WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
-		return rc;
+		goto free_skb_resp;
 	}
 
 	rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
-- 
2.25.1