[PATCH 4.14 12/94] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Sep 21 2020 - 13:03:36 EST
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit f97c04c316d8fea16dca449fdfbe101fbdfee6a2 ]
When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 01acb6e533655..c4b6e29c07192 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -981,7 +981,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
if (rc) {
WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
- return rc;
+ goto free_skb_resp;
}
rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
--
2.25.1