Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] xen-blkback: add a parameter for disabling of persistent grants

From: Jürgen Groß
Date: Tue Sep 22 2020 - 07:35:35 EST


On 22.09.20 13:26, SeongJae Park wrote:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:12:59 +0200 "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 12:52:07PM +0200, SeongJae Park wrote:
From: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>

Persistent grants feature provides high scalability. On some small
systems, however, it could incur data copy overheads[1] and thus it is
required to be disabled. But, there is no option to disable it. For
the reason, this commit adds a module parameter for disabling of the
feature.

[1] https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_4.3_Block_Protocol_Scalability

Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
---
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback | 9 ++++++
drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback
index ecb7942ff146..ac2947b98950 100644
--- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback
+++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-driver-xen-blkback
@@ -35,3 +35,12 @@ Description:
controls the duration in milliseconds that blkback will not
cache any page not backed by a grant mapping.
The default is 10ms.
+
+What: /sys/module/xen_blkback/parameters/feature_persistent
+Date: September 2020
+KernelVersion: 5.10
+Contact: SeongJae Park <sjpark@xxxxxxxxx>
+Description:
+ Whether to enable the persistent grants feature or not. Note
+ that this option only takes effect on newly created backends.
+ The default is Y (enable).
diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
index b9aa5d1ac10b..8a95ddd08b13 100644
--- a/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
+++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkback/xenbus.c
@@ -879,6 +879,12 @@ static void reclaim_memory(struct xenbus_device *dev)
/* ** Connection ** */
+/* Enable the persistent grants feature. */
+static bool feature_persistent = true;
+module_param(feature_persistent, bool, 0644);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(feature_persistent,
+ "Enables the persistent grants feature");
+
/*
* Write the physical details regarding the block device to the store, and
* switch to Connected state.
@@ -906,11 +912,15 @@ static void connect(struct backend_info *be)
xen_blkbk_barrier(xbt, be, be->blkif->vbd.flush_support);
- err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-persistent", "%u", 1);
- if (err) {
- xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, "writing %s/feature-persistent",
- dev->nodename);
- goto abort;
+ if (feature_persistent) {
+ err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "feature-persistent",
+ "%u", feature_persistent);
+ if (err) {
+ xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err,
+ "writing %s/feature-persistent",
+ dev->nodename);
+ goto abort;
+ }
}
err = xenbus_printf(xbt, dev->nodename, "sectors", "%llu",
@@ -1093,8 +1103,12 @@ static int connect_ring(struct backend_info *be)
xenbus_dev_fatal(dev, err, "unknown fe protocol %s", protocol);
return -ENOSYS;
}
- pers_grants = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend, "feature-persistent",
- 0);
+ if (feature_persistent)
+ pers_grants = xenbus_read_unsigned(dev->otherend,
+ "feature-persistent", 0);
+ else
+ pers_grants = 0;
+

Sorry for not realizing earlier, but looking at it again I think you
need to cache the value of feature_persistent when it's first used in
the blkback state data, so that it's consistent.

What would happen for example with the following flow (assume a
persistent grants enabled frontend):

feature_persistent = false

connect(...)
feature-persistent is not written to xenstore

User changes feature_persistent = true

connect_ring(...)
pers_grants = true, because feature-persistent is set unconditionally
by the frontend and feature_persistent variable is now true.

Then blkback will try to use persistent grants and the whole
connection will malfunction because the frontend won't.

Ah, you're right. I should also catch this before but didn't, sorry.


The other option is to prevent changing the variable when there are
blkback instances already running.

I think storing the option value in xenstore would be simpler. That said, if
you prefer this way, please let me know.

No, Xenstore isn't the right place for that. This is a local
implementation detail of blkback and shouldn't be exported to Xenstore.


Juergen