Re: [PATCH 07/25] media: i2c: imx355: silence unused acpi_device_id warning

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Sep 22 2020 - 07:57:15 EST


On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 11:37, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for the patchset!
>
> I believe the I涎 client has been dug up first as we've been dealing with
> I涎 devices all the time, and it's been a pattern. I don't see that as a
> reason to reject the patches either though, it definitely cleans up the
> drivers.
>
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:23:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > If driver is built without ACPI, the struct acpi_device_id won't be
> > used:
> >
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c:1836:36: warning:
> > 'imx355_acpi_ids' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c b/drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c
> > index 51245e71b411..8db287251f49 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/imx355.c
> > @@ -1833,7 +1833,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops imx355_pm_ops = {
> > SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(imx355_suspend, imx355_resume)
> > };
> >
> > -static const struct acpi_device_id imx355_acpi_ids[] = {
> > +static const struct acpi_device_id imx355_acpi_ids[]__maybe_unused = {
>
> A space before __ perhaps?
>
> Albeit this seems to be all, I can address that while applying if that's
> ok.

Yes, there should be a space here. Let me know if I should send v2.

Best regards,
Krzysztof