Re: [PATCH 0/1] Add explicit error for missing CONFIG_ASN1

[Randy Dunlap]

On 9/22/20 12:48 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 12:46 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 9/22/20 12:44 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 12:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On 9/22/20 12:19 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 11:54 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/22/20 8:53 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
>>>>>>> I recently ran into this as an error from 0day.  On x86
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> pretty
>>>>>>> much impossible to build a configuration where CONFIG_ASN1
>>>>>>> isn't
>>>>>>> set, so you rarely notice a problem using the ASN.1
>>>>>>> compiler
>>>>>>> because something else has selected it.  However, this
>>>>>>> compiler
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> never built if CONFIG_ASN1 isn't set and the error you get
>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> kbuild is particularly unhelpful:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    make[4]: *** No rule to make target
>>>>>>> 'security/keys/trusted-
>>>>>>> keys/tpm2key.asn1.o', needed by 'security/keys/trusted-
>>>>>>> keys/built-
>>>>>>> in.a'.
>>>>>>>    make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283:
>>>>>>> security/keys/trusted-
>>>>>>> keys/trusted_tpm2.o] Error 1
>>>>>>>    make[4]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch changes the above error to the much easier to
>>>>>>> diagnose:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    scripts/Makefile.build:387: *** CONFIG_ASN1 must be
>>>>>>> defined
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> the asn1_compiler.  Stop.
>>>>>>>    make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:505:
>>>>>>> security/keys/trusted-
>>>>>>> keys] Error 2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> James
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> James Bottomley (1):
>>>>>>>   Makefile.build: Add an explicit error for missing ASN.1
>>>>>>> compiler
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  scripts/Makefile.build | 5 +++++
>>>>>>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there a missing
>>>>>> 	select ASN1
>>>>>> somewhere?
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean in the build used to produce the errors above?  Yes,
>>>>> so the patch is to make the problem more explicit.
>>>>
>>>> I appreciate that the message can be improved, but it seems
>>>> possible that some Kconfig could also be improved.
>>>
>>> I don't really see how.  To find the problem you have to identify a
>>> conditional build in the Makefile that requires the asn1 compiler
>>> but for which the config option doesn't have a select ASN1.  We
>>> don't currently preserve the "what selected this symbol"
>>> information in kconfig, which is what we'd need.
>>
>> Well, if you have a failing .config file, I would be glad to take a
>> look at it...
> 
> The original problem is already fixed.  The point of this patch is to
> make 0day explicitly identify it if it ever occurs again.

Got it. That's helpful info IMO.

thanks.

-- 
~Randy