Hi!
Can I get details of your setup?
I don't use this trigger, but I can imagine that someone does.
Well, if someone exists, we can increase the limit, or convince them
to change their setup.
What CPU type that is, and how are you mapping CPU activity to LEDs?
The type of CPU is irrelevant here. What is important is the fact
that with this trigger it is possible to visually monitor CPU core
online state. Probably it would be good to ask the author of that
trigger about his use case.
It is relevant -- cpu trigger never worked on x86. I had patch fixing
it, but got pushback.
I have spoken up, because I don't get the reason for your patch.
This driver was reworked year ago to remove PAGE_SIZE limit,
and I even applied it to my for-next tree, but that was at
the time of handling maintainership to yourself, and you
seem to not have picked that commit.
Was that intentional? We had even Greg's ack [0].
I checked, and I believe the commit is in:
#ifdef CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS
static BIN_ATTR(trigger, 0644, led_trigger_read, led_trigger_write,
0);
static struct bin_attribute *led_trigger_bin_attrs[] = {
So.. no, it is not causing kernel crashes or something. But it is
example of bad interface, and _that_ is causing problems. (And yes, if
I realized it is simply possible to limit it, maybe the BIN_ATTR
conversion would not be neccessary...)