Re: [PATCH V2 0/5] Add support for custom names for AT24 EEPROMs

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:50 AM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For platforms that have multiple boards and hence have multiple EEPROMs
> for identifying the different boards, it is useful to label the EEPROMs
> in device-tree so that they can be easily identified. For example, MAC
> address information is stored in the EEPROM on the processor module for
> some Jetson platforms which is not only required by the kernel but the
> bootloader as well. So having a simple way to identify the EEPROM is
> needed.
>
> Changes since V1:
> - By default initialise the nvmem_config.id as NVMEM_DEVID_AUTO and not
>   NVMEM_DEVID_NONE
> - Dropped the 'maxItems' from the dt-binding doc.
>
> Jon Hunter (5):
>   misc: eeprom: at24: Initialise AT24 NVMEM ID field
>   dt-bindings: eeprom: at24: Add label property for AT24
>   misc: eeprom: at24: Support custom device names for AT24 EEPROMs
>   arm64: tegra: Add label properties for EEPROMs
>   arm64: tegra: Populate EEPROMs for Jetson Xavier NX
>
>  .../devicetree/bindings/eeprom/at24.yaml      |  3 +++
>  .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p2771-0000.dts   |  1 +
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra186-p3310.dtsi |  1 +
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p2888.dtsi |  1 +
>  .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p2972-0000.dts   |  1 +
>  .../nvidia/tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000.dts | 14 ++++++++++++
>  .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra194-p3668-0000.dtsi  | 16 ++++++++++++++
>  .../arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2180.dtsi |  1 +
>  .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p2371-2180.dts   |  1 +
>  .../boot/dts/nvidia/tegra210-p3450-0000.dts   |  2 ++
>  drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c                    | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  11 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Just FYI: I'm fine with the at24 part. I can take them through my tree
for v5.10. Who is taking the DTS patches for tegra? Thierry? I can
provide you with an immutable branch if that's fine. I can't just ack
the at24 patches because they conflict with what I already have in my
tree for v5.10.

Bartosz