Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Mark SEV launch secret pages as dirty.

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 23/09/20 19:04, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Two of the three instances are a bit different though.  What about this
>> which at least shortens the comment to 2 fewer lines:
> Any objection to changing those to "Flush (on non-coherent CPUs)"?  I agree
> it would be helpful to call out the details, especially for DBG_*, but I
> don't like that it reads as if the flush is unconditional.

Hmm... It's already fairly long lines so that would wrap to 3 lines, and
the reference to the conditional flush wasn't there before either.

sev_clflush_pages could be a better place to mention that (or perhaps
it's self-explanatory).

Paolo