Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] clk: axi-clk-gen: misc updates to the driver
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Wed Sep 23 2020 - 19:58:36 EST
Quoting Alexandru Ardelean (2020-09-22 23:22:33)
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:42 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Quoting Moritz Fischer (2020-09-14 19:41:38)
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:11:05AM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> > > > <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > These patches synchronize the driver with the current state in the
> > > > > Analog Devices Linux tree:
> > > > > https://github.com/analogdevicesinc/linux/
> > > > >
> > > > > They have been in the tree for about 2-3, so they did receive some
> > > > > testing.
> > > >
> > > > Ping on this series.
> > > > Do I need to do a re-send?
> > I got this patch series twice. Not sure why.
> My fault here.
> Some Ctrl + R usage and not being attentive with the arguments.
> I think I added "*.patch" twice on the send-mail command.
> I did something similar [by accident] for some DMA patches.
> I can do a re-send for this, if it helps.
Sure. Please resend it.
> > >
> > > I've applied the FPGA one, the other ones should go through the clock
> > > tree I think?
> > Doesn't patch 6 rely on the FPGA patch? How can that driver build
> > without the header file?
> Yes it does depend on the FPGA patch.
> We can drop patch 6 for now, pending a merge to Linus' tree and then
> wait for the trickle-down.
> I don't mind waiting for these patches.
> I have plenty of backlog that I want to run through, and cleanup and
> then upstream.
> So, there is no hurry.
Can you send me a signed tag with that patch? I can base this patch
series on top of that. Or I can just apply it to clk tree and if nobody
changes it in the meantime merge should work out in linux-next and
linus' tree upstream.