Looking further at the drivers using ide_host_register(), I see that
falconide.c is missing a set_drvdata() call, while tx4939ide.c calls
set_drvdata() after ide_host_register(). The latter example is not a bug.
The pattern I used, that is, calling set_drvdata() after ide_host_add(),
is actually more popular among IDE drivers than the pattern you suggested,
that is, set_drvdata() followed by ide_host_register(). Either way, I
don't see any bugs besides the one in falconide.c.
Regarding falconide.c, my inclination is to send a fix following the more
common pattern (among IDE drivers), as below. I guess that may prompt the
subsystem maintainers to make known their views on the style question.
diff --git a/drivers/ide/falconide.c b/drivers/ide/falconide.c
index dbeb2605e5f6e..607c44bc50f1b 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/falconide.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/falconide.c
@@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ static int __init falconide_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (rc)
goto err_free;
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, host);
return 0;
err_free:
ide_host_free(host);
@@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ static int __init falconide_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int falconide_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct ide_host *host = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+ struct ide_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
ide_host_remove(host);