Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] dt-bindings: cpufreq: add bindings for MediaTek cpufreq HW
From: Hector Yuan
Date: Fri Sep 25 2020 - 03:26:00 EST
Hi, Rob sir:
Yes, my patch follows
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt way to
define frequency domain.
Is it OK to you if I use the same way to do?
And if there exist any schema problem, please kindly let me know how to
fix it.
My patch reference
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
to use the cpu node.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-cooling-devices.yaml
Thanks a lot.
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 11:45 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 25-09-20, 10:27, Hector Yuan wrote:
> > Hi, Viresh & Rob Sir:
> >
> > I will change frequency domain to below and define it in cpufreq_hw
> > schema rather than cpu node.
> >
> > mediatek,freq-domain-0 = <&cpu0>, <&cpu1>;
>
> I think it would be better to do it the standard way we have done it elsewhere.
> i.e. follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-qcom-hw.txt, that
> is similar to what you did earlier.
>