Re: [PATCH 7/9] mm, page_alloc: move draining pcplists to page isolation users
From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Fri Sep 25 2020 - 06:40:00 EST
On 22.09.20 16:37, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Currently, pcplists are drained during set_migratetype_isolate() which means
> once per pageblock processed start_isolate_page_range(). This is somewhat
> wasteful. Moreover, the callers might need different guarantees, and the
> draining is currently prone to races and does not guarantee that no page
> from isolated pageblock will end up on the pcplist after the drain.
>
> Better guarantees are added by later patches and require explicit actions
> by page isolation users that need them. Thus it makes sense to move the
> current imperfect draining to the callers also as a preparation step.
>
> Suggested-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@xxxxxxxxxx>
I would have guessed I suggested that one first as well :)
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6ec66eb9-eeba-5076-af97-cef59ed5cbaa@xxxxxxxxxx
(But honestly, I don't care :), just stumbled over it)
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 11 ++++++-----
> mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
> mm/page_isolation.c | 10 +++++-----
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 9db80ee29caa..08f729922e18 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1524,6 +1524,8 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> goto failed_removal;
> }
>
> + drain_all_pages(zone);
> +
> arg.start_pfn = start_pfn;
> arg.nr_pages = nr_pages;
> node_states_check_changes_offline(nr_pages, zone, &arg);
> @@ -1574,11 +1576,10 @@ int __ref offline_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> }
>
> /*
> - * per-cpu pages are drained in start_isolate_page_range, but if
> - * there are still pages that are not free, make sure that we
> - * drain again, because when we isolated range we might
> - * have raced with another thread that was adding pages to pcp
> - * list.
> + * per-cpu pages are drained after start_isolate_page_range, but
> + * if there are still pages that are not free, make sure that we
> + * drain again, because when we isolated range we might have
> + * raced with another thread that was adding pages to pcp list.
> *
> * Forward progress should be still guaranteed because
> * pages on the pcp list can only belong to MOVABLE_ZONE
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 901907799bdc..4e37bc3f6077 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -8432,6 +8432,8 @@ int alloc_contig_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + drain_all_pages(cc.zone);
> +
> /*
> * In case of -EBUSY, we'd like to know which page causes problem.
> * So, just fall through. test_pages_isolated() has a tracepoint
> diff --git a/mm/page_isolation.c b/mm/page_isolation.c
> index abfe26ad59fd..57d8bc1e7760 100644
> --- a/mm/page_isolation.c
> +++ b/mm/page_isolation.c
> @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int set_migratetype_isolate(struct page *page, int migratetype, int isol_
>
> __mod_zone_freepage_state(zone, -nr_pages, mt);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&zone->lock, flags);
> - drain_all_pages(zone);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -167,11 +166,12 @@ __first_valid_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
> *
> * Please note that there is no strong synchronization with the page allocator
> * either. Pages might be freed while their page blocks are marked ISOLATED.
> - * In some cases pages might still end up on pcp lists and that would allow
> + * A call to drain_all_pages() after isolation can flush most of them. However
> + * in some cases pages might still end up on pcp lists and that would allow
> * for their allocation even when they are in fact isolated already. Depending
> - * on how strong of a guarantee the caller needs drain_all_pages might be needed
> - * (e.g. __offline_pages will need to call it after check for isolated range for
> - * a next retry).
> + * on how strong of a guarantee the caller needs, further drain_all_pages()
> + * might be needed (e.g. __offline_pages will need to call it after check for
> + * isolated range for a next retry).
> *
> * Return: 0 on success and -EBUSY if any part of range cannot be isolated.
> */
>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb