Re: [PATCH] media: atomisp: Fixed error handling path
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Tue Sep 29 2020 - 02:14:54 EST
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 07:34:39AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 2:08 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:38:04PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > > Inside alloc_user_pages() based on flag value either pin_user_pages()
> > > or get_user_pages_fast() will be called. However, these API might fail.
> > >
> > > But free_user_pages() called in error handling path doesn't bother
> > > about return value and will try to unpin bo->pgnr pages, which is
> > > incorrect.
> > >
> > > Fix this by passing the page_nr to free_user_pages(). If page_nr > 0
> > > pages will be unpinned based on bo->mem_type. This will also take care
> > > of non error handling path.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 14a638ab96c5 ("media: atomisp: use pin_user_pages() for memory
> > > allocation")
> > > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm_bo.c | 13 ++++++++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm_bo.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm_bo.c
> > > index f13af23..0168f98 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm_bo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm_bo.c
> > > @@ -857,16 +857,17 @@ static void free_private_pages(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > kfree(bo->page_obj);
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void free_user_pages(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo)
> > > +static void free_user_pages(struct hmm_buffer_object *bo,
> > > + unsigned int page_nr)
> > > {
> > > int i;
> > >
> > > hmm_mem_stat.usr_size -= bo->pgnr;
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This is still a problem. It needs to be hmm_mem_stat.usr_size -= page_nr.
>
> In failure path, it is hmm_mem_stat.usr_size += bo->pgnr.
> I think, hmm_mem_stat.usr_size -= bo->pgnr is correct as per existing code.
> Do you think that needs to be changed ?
>
Yeah. Crud. I'm sorry. You had it right.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
regards,
dan carpenter