Re: [RFC] Add RIP to scripts/decodecode

From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Tue Sep 29 2020 - 09:23:07 EST


On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 01:40:03PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [dropping these ARM people I never heard of...]

Yeah, I completely forgot that those ARM folks are not there anymore,
thx! :-)

> Looks neat. Only objection is that RIP is pretty tainted from an
> architecture perspective. How about PC instead, which most people
> understand immediately?

Sure.

> Bonus points if you can convince decodecode to grok something such
> as "do_undefinstr+0x2e0/0x2f0" as the PC! ;-)

Well, I thought about it. And I don't know how the splats look on ARM
but on x86 we're not dumping the actual PC contents anymore:

[ 477.366747][T23917] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000100-0x0000000000000107]
[ 477.374897][T23917] CPU: 1 PID: 23917 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc7+ #1
[ 477.376375][T23917] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-1 04/01/2014
[ 477.378098][T23917] RIP: 0010:gfs2_rgrp_dump+0x37/0x660
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

so I could make the splat code dump PC again, but in brackets:

[ 477.378098][T23917] RIP: 0010:gfs2_rgrp_dump+0x37/0x660 (0xffffffff8329a927)

or I would have to somehow have access to vmlinux or symbols which would
give me the function address. But that is not always the case - most of
the time you see a splat somewhere and that's all.

Unless you have a better idea...

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette