Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] iio: cros_ec: use devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()

[Alexandru Ardelean]

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:55 PM Alexandru Ardelean
> <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > This change switches to the new devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext()
> > function and removes the iio_buffer_set_attrs() call, for assigning the
> > HW FIFO attributes to the buffer.
>
> Sorry, you were too fast with the version, below one nit.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c | 15 +++++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > index c62cacc04672..1eafcf04ad69 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/common/cros_ec_sensors/cros_ec_sensors_core.c
> > @@ -353,19 +353,22 @@ int cros_ec_sensors_core_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >                         if (ret)
> >                                 return ret;
> >                 } else {
> > +                       const struct attribute **fifo_attrs;
> > +
> > +                       if (has_hw_fifo)
> > +                               fifo_attrs = cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes;
> > +                       else
> > +                               fifo_attrs = NULL;
> > +
> >                         /*
> >                          * The only way to get samples in buffer is to set a
> >                          * software trigger (systrig, hrtimer).
> >                          */
> > -                       ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup(
>
> > +                       ret = devm_iio_triggered_buffer_setup_ext(
> >                                         dev, indio_dev, NULL, trigger_capture,
> > -                                       NULL);
> > +                                       NULL, fifo_attrs);
>
> Perhaps it's time to reformat a bit, i.e. move dev to the first line
> and do the rest accordingly?

this feels like a mix of preferences here;
for once, the patch here [as-is], is the minimal form for this change
[in terms of patch-noise];
so, some people would choose the least noisiest patch;

also, this indentation was chosen [as-is here] from the start [for
this code block];
not sure if it was preferred; i'd suspect it was due to the old 80-col limit;

i'd leave it as-is [for now], or defer the decision to a maintainer to
decide [either IIO or chromium];

>
> >                         if (ret)
> >                                 return ret;
> > -
> > -                       if (has_hw_fifo)
> > -                               iio_buffer_set_attrs(indio_dev->buffer,
> > -                                                    cros_ec_sensor_fifo_attributes);
> >                 }
> >         }
> >
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko