Re: [PATCH] arm64: PCI: Validate the node before setting node id for root bus
From: Baolin Wang
Date: Tue Sep 29 2020 - 11:41:33 EST
Hi,
在 2020/9/28 23:23, Lorenzo Pieralisi 写道:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:00:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
[+ Lorenzo]
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 06:33:24PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
If the BIOS disabled the NUMA configuration, but did not change the
proximity domain description in the SRAT table, so the PCI root bus
device may get a incorrect node id by acpi_get_node().
How "incorrect" are we talking here? What actually goes wrong? At some
point, we have to trust what the firmware is telling us.
What I mean is, if we disable the NUMA from BIOS
Please define what this means ie are you removing SRAT from ACPI static
tables ?
Yes.
but we did not change the PXM for the PCI devices,
If a _PXM maps to a proximity domain that is not described in the SRAT
your firmware is buggy.
Sorry for confusing, that's not what I mean. When the BIOS disable the
NUMA (remove the SRAT table), but the PCI devices' _PXM description is
still available, which means we can still get the pxm from
acpi_evaluate_integer() in this case.
So we can get below inconsistent log on ARM platform:
"No NUMA configuration found
PCI_bus 0000:00 on NUMA node 0
...
PCI_bus 0000:e3 on NUMA node 1"
On X86, the pci_acpi_root_get_node() will validate the node before
setting the node id for root bus. So I think we can add this validation
for ARM platform. Or anything else I missed?
so the PCI devices can still get a numa node id from acpi_get_node().
For example, we can still get the numa node id = 1 in this case from
acpi_get_node(), but the numa_nodes_parsed is empty, which means the
node id 1 is invalid. We should add a validation for the node id when
setting the root bus node id.
The kernel is not a firmware validation test suite, so fix the firmware
please.
Having said that, please provide a trace log of the issue this is
causing, if any.
See above.